[연구진 동정] 봉영식 전문연구원 - Analysts: Military Options Against North Korea Fraught With Danger

8월 4 업데이트됨

Analysts: Military Options Against North Korea Fraught With Danger

March 08, 2017 4:46 AM

· Brian Padden

FILE- North Korean soldiers turn and look towards their leader Kim Jong Un from a military parade vehicle as they carry packs marked with the nuclear symbol during a ceremony marking the 60th anniversary of the Korean War.

Frustrated that North Korea has been undeterred by international sanctions, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is conducting a policy review to look for more effective ways to counter Pyongyang's missile and nuclear threats. Adding new urgency to this longstanding security threat is North Korea’s accelerated efforts to develop the capability to strike the U.S. mainland with a nuclear tipped intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM.) In January President Trump tweeted “it will not happen,” in response to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s statement indicating that his country would soon test an ICBM. U.S. administration officials say that all options are on the table to deal with the increasing North Korean threat, including military action and deploying nuclear weapons in South Korea and Japan. Regional security analysts Grant Newsham with the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies in Tokyo, and Bong Young-shik with the Yonsei University Institute for North Korean Studies in Seoul talked to VOA about the risks and the benefits of some measures being considered.

FILE - Artillery pieces are fired during a military drill at an unknown location in this undated photo released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on March 25, 2016.

High risk: Military strike Preemptive U.S. military air or missile strikes to take out North Korean nuclear and missile sites are unlikely to end the nuclear threat, and there is a high risk of deadly counterattacks that could draw China and the entire region into war, say these analysts. “Really if a military strike or approach is considered, the U.S. had better be ready to go all in and be ready to finish it,” said Newsham. North Korea has hundreds of mobile missile launchers, many of which are kept in underground bunkers that would be hard to detect and target. Even if U.S. strikes could destroy all of the country’s nuclear and long-range missile facilities, North Korea could still attack Seoul and other regions near the inter-Korean border with artillery and chemical weapons that could kill millions in South Korea. By taking unilateral military action against North Korea, the United States would be putting its own security needs ahead of its allies in Asia and would likely trigger a regional political backlash. “They will put almost all South Korean citizens against the United States because it is totally against the very purpose of the security partnership between the United States and South Korea,” said Bong. Even limited military actions, these analysts say, could too easily draw the United States into another military quagmire that could cause massive devastation and economic ruin. No benefit: Nuclear allies Either deploying American nuclear weapons in South Korea and Japan or allowing them to acquire their own may bolster U.S. support for its allies in Asia, but these analysts say they will not likely restrain North Korea. The United States withdrew tactical nuclear weapons from South Korea in 1991. Subsequently the two Koreas signed an agreement to keep the peninsula free of nuclear weapons.

North Korea later walked away from the agreement, citing the threat of a U.S. invasion. Analysts say reintroducing nuclear weapons in the South, and deploying them in Japan for the first time, would likely legitimize the North’s nuclear arsenal and justify its efforts to develop long-range ballistic missile deterrence. It would also weaken the international commitment to maintain sanctions against Pyongyang and could spark a global nuclear buildup.

FILE - A North Korean factory worker walks through a processing hall at the Pyongyang 326 Electric Wire Factory pull Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2017, in Pyongyang, North Korea.

Difficult: Effective sanctions Imposing real economic pain remains the best of the bad options to restrain North Korea from continuing to develop its nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities. “You have to put North Korea in a situation where the leadership has to decide between the continuous pursuit of nuclear weapons and missiles, and its survival.And I don’t think North Korea is very close to being forced to make such a big decision,” said Bong. The international sanctions imposed on North Korea have not had a restraining influence so far, in part because of lax enforcement. “They have allowed the regime to get the money they need to survive and that has always been the regime’s key vulnerability, the need for money,” said Newsham. The North’s key economic trading partner China is reluctant to strictly implement crippling measures that might destabilize the region or lead to the collapse of its ally. North Korea has also been able to get around the imposed international restrictions by using companies in friendly countries like China to act as illicit fronts. Last month the United Nations accused North Korea of “flouting sanctions through trade in prohibited goods, with evasion techniques that are increasing in scale, scope and sophistication." To more effectively crack down on North Korea’s illicit financial dealings, the United States would likely have to target more Chinese companies that do business with North Korea On Wednesday a Chinese telecom equipment maker ZTE Corp. agreed to plead guilty and pay nearly $900 million in a U.S. sanctions case, for dodging export controls in Iran, North Korea, Syria, Sudan and Cuba. However China strongly opposes foreign governments putting unilateral sanctions on Chinese companies and there are concerns that Beijing will retaliate against any increased U.S. pressure or legal actions.

*원문 링크: http://www.voanews.com/a/military-options-against-north-korea-fraught-with-danger/3754940.html

최근 게시물

전체 보기

[연구원 소식] 2020년 1월

제 4차 윌리엄 페리 강연시리즈 개최 연세대학교 통일연구원(원장 최아진)은 <제 4차 윌리엄 페리 강연 시리즈>를 태평양세기연구소(PCI)의 후원으로 2019년 11월 12일 화요일 연세대학교 새천년관 대강당에서 개최하였다. 이번 강연은 로버트 칼린(Robert L. Carlin) 스탠포드대학교 초빙연구원을 연사로 초청하여 ‘Bad Decisions, Ba

[연구진 동정] 2020년 1월

[김성보 교수] 김성보 교수는 11월 16일에 개최된 연세대학교 국학연구원 학술회의 [한반도 평화의 시대, 북한 지식의 역사를 새롭게 읽는다]에서 "비판적 한반도학의 관점에서 본 북조선 연구"에 관해 발표하였다. [차정미 연구교수] 차정미 연구교수는<사이버 안보의 국가전략 3.0: 16개국의 전략형성과 추진체계 비교>(김상배 편저, 사회평론아카데미)의 1

[연구원 소식] 2019년 10월

국제학술회의 ‘Cooperation and Competition among Great Powers and the Future of Indo-Pacific’ 개최 연세대학교 통일연구원(원장 최아진)이 주최하고 연세대학교, 한국연구재단이 후원하는 국제학술회의 ‘Cooperation and Competition among Great Powers and the F


       (+82) 02-2123-4605 (Phone)

       02-338-6729 (Fax)       




     3rd Floor, 5-26, Sinchon-ro 4-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul


Newsletter Subscription

Follow YINKS

  • Facebook

© 2020 연세대학교 통일연구원 |  Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy