검색

13권 1호_ 박종철_북핵 관련 남북한, 미국의 3자관계와 대북정책 방향

2009년 13권 1호. 북핵 관련 남북한, 미국의 3자관계와 대북정책 방향 _ 박종철

초록 보기

After the inauguration of the Obama administration, negotiations on North Korea`s nuclear development and U.S.-North Korean relations will proceed according to the following five stages. The first stage is to implement the October 3 statement based on the September 19 statement of the six-party talks. In the second stage, North Korea will accept the abandonment of her nuclear program, inspection of nuclear activities, improvement of human rights in return for diplomatic normalization between Washington and Pyongyang. In the fourth stage, North Korea will dismantle her nuclear programs and surrender her nuclear materials and nuclear weapons together with the holding of a summit meeting between Washington and Pyongyang. This meeting will be accompanied by aid to North Korea from international financial institutions. In the fifth and final stage, North Korea will fully abandon nuclear materials and nuclear weapons and a new peace treaty on the Korean peninsula will be concluded. In sum, despite many difficulties, the U.S.-North Korean negotiations are able to proceed to the second stage. However, from the third stage, the U.S.-North Korean negotiations will face difficulties concerning the abandonment of nuclear weapons, diplomatic normalization, and the reform of North Korea`s system. South Korea`s first challenge is to link the nuclear problem and inter-Korean relations. One option is to partially link the two issues, improving inter-Korean relations in accordance with progress in the nuclear negotiations. It is undesirable and impractical to set up denuclearization as the precondition of inter-Korean relations. Likewise, it is also impractical to separate inter-Korean relations from the denuclearization process. South Korea`s second challenge is how to harmonize inter-Korean relations with those of U.S.-North Korean relations. South Korea concerns herself with the possibility of improving the U.S.-North Korean relations in the face of the continuing stalemate in inter-Korean relations. This will reduce Seoul`s position in its relations with the U.S. and North Korea and curtail her freedom of maneuver and initiative in handling general Korean peninsula issues. To prevent this situation, U.S.-South Korean coordination is necessary. South Korea and the U.S. should consult at various government levels and utilize their diverse contacts through both the 1.5 track and civilian track. Washington and Seoul should have common positions about the denuclearization process, security guarantees for North Korea, economic compensation, and so on. Considering this situation, South Korea`s policy towards North Korea should be one of selective engagement. This is to maintain the basic outline of engagement while arranging economic aid and cooperation in accordance with the progress of negotiations with t he North and t he changes in North Korea`s position. The policy of selective engagement values principle and universal standards while managing the Korean peninsula situation and improving inter-Korean relations. In order to encourage or elicit a positive response from the North, the following measures need to be considered. First, formal and informal high-level contacts between Seoul and Pyongyang are advisable. High-level inter-Korean meetings will discuss Seoul`s North Korea policy, a new framework of inter-Korean relations, denuclearization, and other pending issues. Second, the two Koreas should take steps towards confidence building measures to create a favorable environment for inter-Korean dialogue. Third, the two documents of the inter-Korean summit meetings, the 6.15 statement and the 10.4 statement, should be given greater prominence. The two Koreas should discuss the implementation process in detail considering feasibility, economic resources, and popular support. Fourth, humanitarian aid can be a starting point to resume an inter-Korean dialogue. Fifth, policies for establishing a peace regime on the Korean peninsula should be prepared.

첨부 [1]

149. 2009년13권1호
.북핵관련남북한,미국의3자관계와대북정책방향_박
Download 북핵관련남북한,미국의3자관계와대북정책방향_박 • 570KB

최근 게시물

전체 보기

24권 2호_손인배, 이영준, 신보경_북한이탈주민 정착지원 실무자의 직업적 자기효능감과 소진 관계에서 회복탄력성의 매개효과

초록 (국문) 본 연구는 북한이탈주민 정착지원 실무자의 직업적 자기효능감이 소진에 미치는 영향을 확인하고, 회복탄력성의 매개효과를 검증하는 데 목적이 있다. 연구대상은 북한이탈주민 정착지원 실무를 담당하는 하나원, 남북하나재단, 북한이탈주민 전문상담사, 사회복지사 등 144명이다. 분석은 SPSS 25.0와 SPSS Process macro 3.5를 사용하

24권 2호_최희_북한이탈여성들의 정체성 협상-사회구조적인 측면을 중심으로

초록 (국문) 이 연구는 남한과 북한에 가족을 두고 있는 북한이탈여성들이 남북관계라는 다양한 이해관계 속에서 겪는 갈등을 조정하기 위한 과정에서 변화하는 정체성을 살펴보고 사회와 상호작용의 본질이 무엇인지를 검토하여 개선방향을 제시하는 데 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 현상학적 사례연구방법을 적용하여 북한이탈여성의 삶의 경험 속에서 협상되는 정체성의 의미를

24권 2호_김미연_개성공업지구 갈등원인의 유형 분석

초록(국문) 본 연구는 개성공단 내에서 발생한 갈등사례의 원인을 유형화하고 유형별 특성을 파악하는 데 목적이 있다. 개성공단은 북한지역에 산업단지 형태로 조성하였고 운영주체가 남한 정부, 북한 당국, 입주기업 3자라는 점에서 갈등원인이 다양하다. 그러므로 개성공단 갈등양상을 깊이 있게 이해하고 갈등을 관리하는 것은 개성공단사업의 원만한 추진을 위해 중요하다

       Contact 

       (+82) 02-2123-4605 (Phone)

       02-338-6729 (Fax)       

       E-mail

       yinks@yonsei.ac.kr

       Address

     3rd Floor, 5-26, Sinchon-ro 4-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul

Newsletter Subscription

Follow YINKS

  • Facebook

© 2020 연세대학교 통일연구원 |  Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy