top of page

13권 1호_ 박종철_북핵 관련 남북한, 미국의 3자관계와 대북정책 방향

2009년 13권 1호. 북핵 관련 남북한, 미국의 3자관계와 대북정책 방향 _ 박종철

초록 보기

After the inauguration of the Obama administration, negotiations on North Korea`s nuclear development and U.S.-North Korean relations will proceed according to the following five stages. The first stage is to implement the October 3 statement based on the September 19 statement of the six-party talks. In the second stage, North Korea will accept the abandonment of her nuclear program, inspection of nuclear activities, improvement of human rights in return for diplomatic normalization between Washington and Pyongyang. In the fourth stage, North Korea will dismantle her nuclear programs and surrender her nuclear materials and nuclear weapons together with the holding of a summit meeting between Washington and Pyongyang. This meeting will be accompanied by aid to North Korea from international financial institutions. In the fifth and final stage, North Korea will fully abandon nuclear materials and nuclear weapons and a new peace treaty on the Korean peninsula will be concluded. In sum, despite many difficulties, the U.S.-North Korean negotiations are able to proceed to the second stage. However, from the third stage, the U.S.-North Korean negotiations will face difficulties concerning the abandonment of nuclear weapons, diplomatic normalization, and the reform of North Korea`s system. South Korea`s first challenge is to link the nuclear problem and inter-Korean relations. One option is to partially link the two issues, improving inter-Korean relations in accordance with progress in the nuclear negotiations. It is undesirable and impractical to set up denuclearization as the precondition of inter-Korean relations. Likewise, it is also impractical to separate inter-Korean relations from the denuclearization process. South Korea`s second challenge is how to harmonize inter-Korean relations with those of U.S.-North Korean relations. South Korea concerns herself with the possibility of improving the U.S.-North Korean relations in the face of the continuing stalemate in inter-Korean relations. This will reduce Seoul`s position in its relations with the U.S. and North Korea and curtail her freedom of maneuver and initiative in handling general Korean peninsula issues. To prevent this situation, U.S.-South Korean coordination is necessary. South Korea and the U.S. should consult at various government levels and utilize their diverse contacts through both the 1.5 track and civilian track. Washington and Seoul should have common positions about the denuclearization process, security guarantees for North Korea, economic compensation, and so on. Considering this situation, South Korea`s policy towards North Korea should be one of selective engagement. This is to maintain the basic outline of engagement while arranging economic aid and cooperation in accordance with the progress of negotiations with t he North and t he changes in North Korea`s position. The policy of selective engagement values principle and universal standards while managing the Korean peninsula situation and improving inter-Korean relations. In order to encourage or elicit a positive response from the North, the following measures need to be considered. First, formal and informal high-level contacts between Seoul and Pyongyang are advisable. High-level inter-Korean meetings will discuss Seoul`s North Korea policy, a new framework of inter-Korean relations, denuclearization, and other pending issues. Second, the two Koreas should take steps towards confidence building measures to create a favorable environment for inter-Korean dialogue. Third, the two documents of the inter-Korean summit meetings, the 6.15 statement and the 10.4 statement, should be given greater prominence. The two Koreas should discuss the implementation process in detail considering feasibility, economic resources, and popular support. Fourth, humanitarian aid can be a starting point to resume an inter-Korean dialogue. Fifth, policies for establishing a peace regime on the Korean peninsula should be prepared.

첨부 [1]

149. 2009년13권1호
.북핵관련남북한,미국의3자관계와대북정책방향_박
북핵관련남북한,미국의3자관계와대북정책방향_박 다운로드 • 570KB

최근 게시물

전체 보기

26권 2호_장도환, 이승훈, 임창식, 임정빈_북한의 농산물 무역 및 매체동향 분석을 통한 남북협력유망품목 발굴에 대한 연구

초록 북한은 국제사회의 대북제재로 인한 식량지원 감소, 농기자재 공급 부족, 농산물 수출입 감소 등으로 어려움을 겪고 있으며, 식량난과 경제난은 더욱 가중되고 있다. 현재, 남북‧북미관계는 냉각기에 있으나, 향후 개선된다면 농업분야 남북협력사업은 실현 가능성과 성공 가능성이 가장 높은 분야이다. 북한의 낮은 농업생산성과 식량문제를 해결하기 위해서 남북농업협

26권 2호_구본윤, 박성호_김정은 시기 핵전략의 이중성: 확증보복태세와 허세부리기

초록 이 연구는 나랑의 핵태세 최적화 이론을 비판적으로 검토해, 북한의 특수성을 포착할 수 있는 대안적 분석 틀로 김정은 시기 핵전략을 구체화했다. 변수의 핵심은 북한의 위협인식과 전략문화의 반영이다. 연구 결과, 북한의 핵전략은 평시에는 확증보복태세를, 한·미 연합 군사연습 시기와 같은 위협인식 고조 시 비대칭확전태세의 이중적 특성을 보인다. 이에 대한

26권 2호_박상현, 정민경, 박지영_역대 대통령의 통일 관련 연설문에서 등장하는 토픽 변화 분석: 구조적 토픽 모형과 Word2Vec을 이용한 접근

초록 본 연구는 역대 대통령의 통일 관련 연설문을 분석하여 ‘통일’에 관한 의제가 대통령별로 어떤 맥락과 목적에서 사용되어왔는지를 경험적인 방법으로 비교하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 분석을 위해 본 연구에서는 구조적 토픽 모형을 사용하여 대통령별로, 남북 주요 합의 시점별로 토픽을 추출하고 토픽의 등장 확률을 분석하였으며, Word2Vec을 사용하여 맥락에 대

Comments


bottom of page