검색

13권 1호_ 박종철_북핵 관련 남북한, 미국의 3자관계와 대북정책 방향

2009년 13권 1호. 북핵 관련 남북한, 미국의 3자관계와 대북정책 방향 _ 박종철

초록 보기

After the inauguration of the Obama administration, negotiations on North Korea`s nuclear development and U.S.-North Korean relations will proceed according to the following five stages. The first stage is to implement the October 3 statement based on the September 19 statement of the six-party talks. In the second stage, North Korea will accept the abandonment of her nuclear program, inspection of nuclear activities, improvement of human rights in return for diplomatic normalization between Washington and Pyongyang. In the fourth stage, North Korea will dismantle her nuclear programs and surrender her nuclear materials and nuclear weapons together with the holding of a summit meeting between Washington and Pyongyang. This meeting will be accompanied by aid to North Korea from international financial institutions. In the fifth and final stage, North Korea will fully abandon nuclear materials and nuclear weapons and a new peace treaty on the Korean peninsula will be concluded. In sum, despite many difficulties, the U.S.-North Korean negotiations are able to proceed to the second stage. However, from the third stage, the U.S.-North Korean negotiations will face difficulties concerning the abandonment of nuclear weapons, diplomatic normalization, and the reform of North Korea`s system. South Korea`s first challenge is to link the nuclear problem and inter-Korean relations. One option is to partially link the two issues, improving inter-Korean relations in accordance with progress in the nuclear negotiations. It is undesirable and impractical to set up denuclearization as the precondition of inter-Korean relations. Likewise, it is also impractical to separate inter-Korean relations from the denuclearization process. South Korea`s second challenge is how to harmonize inter-Korean relations with those of U.S.-North Korean relations. South Korea concerns herself with the possibility of improving the U.S.-North Korean relations in the face of the continuing stalemate in inter-Korean relations. This will reduce Seoul`s position in its relations with the U.S. and North Korea and curtail her freedom of maneuver and initiative in handling general Korean peninsula issues. To prevent this situation, U.S.-South Korean coordination is necessary. South Korea and the U.S. should consult at various government levels and utilize their diverse contacts through both the 1.5 track and civilian track. Washington and Seoul should have common positions about the denuclearization process, security guarantees for North Korea, economic compensation, and so on. Considering this situation, South Korea`s policy towards North Korea should be one of selective engagement. This is to maintain the basic outline of engagement while arranging economic aid and cooperation in accordance with the progress of negotiations with t he North and t he changes in North Korea`s position. The policy of selective engagement values principle and universal standards while managing the Korean peninsula situation and improving inter-Korean relations. In order to encourage or elicit a positive response from the North, the following measures need to be considered. First, formal and informal high-level contacts between Seoul and Pyongyang are advisable. High-level inter-Korean meetings will discuss Seoul`s North Korea policy, a new framework of inter-Korean relations, denuclearization, and other pending issues. Second, the two Koreas should take steps towards confidence building measures to create a favorable environment for inter-Korean dialogue. Third, the two documents of the inter-Korean summit meetings, the 6.15 statement and the 10.4 statement, should be given greater prominence. The two Koreas should discuss the implementation process in detail considering feasibility, economic resources, and popular support. Fourth, humanitarian aid can be a starting point to resume an inter-Korean dialogue. Fifth, policies for establishing a peace regime on the Korean peninsula should be prepared.

첨부 [1]

149. 2009년13권1호
.북핵관련남북한,미국의3자관계와대북정책방향_박
Download 북핵관련남북한,미국의3자관계와대북정책방향_박 • 570KB

최근 게시물

전체 보기

24권 1호_이흥석_북한체제 내구성에 관한 연구 -수령제의 제도화를 중심으로

북한체제 내구성에 관한 연구 -수령제의 제도화를 중심으로-_이흥석 초록(한국어) 본 연구의 목적은 북한체제가 불안정한 환경에도 불구하고 수령제의 제도화가 체제의 내구성의 동인임을 규명하는 데 있다. 북한은 사회주의체제 전환, 선대 수령의 사망, 경제난에도 불구하고 3대 세습에 성공했다. 하지만 북한체제의 내구성에 관한 기존연구는 체제 내구성의 중요한 동인으

24권 1호_문한필, 김영훈, 임채환_북한 농림축산물 비교우위 분석을 통한 남북농업협력 가능성 모색

24권 1호_문한필, 김영훈, 임채환_북한 농림축산물 비교우위 분석을 통한 남북농업협력 가능성 모색 초록(한국어) 대북제재가 해제되고, 한반도의 평화체제 전환과 함께 남북한 간 교류협력이 본격적으로 추진될 경우, 북한의 식량문제와 경제여건, 정책방향 등을 감안할 때, 농업분야 협력이 우선 추진될 것으로 예상된다. 본 연구에서는 북한의 무역통계, 시장가격 자

24권 1호_최선경_북한주민의 친족과 민족 유대 -중국 조선족과의 관계를 중심으로

24권 1호_최선경_북한주민의 친족과 민족 유대 -중국 조선족과의 관계를 중심으로 초록(한국어) 이 글은 북·중 접경지역 북한주민의 이동과 중국에서의 생활을 친족과 민족 유대라는 측면에서 분석한다. 중국의 개혁개방과 북한의 경제난을 기점으로, 문화대혁명 시기 단절되었던 북·중 간의 친족 연결은 다시 재개되었고 양편의 이동도 늘어났다. 본 연구는 중국에 친척

       Contact 

       (+82) 02-2123-4605 (Phone)

       02-338-6729 (Fax)       

       E-mail

       yinks@yonsei.ac.kr

       Address

     3rd Floor, 5-26, Sinchon-ro 4-gil, Mapo-gu, Seoul

사회문화

Newsletter Subscription

Follow YINKS

  • Facebook

© 2020 연세대학교 통일연구원 |  Terms of Use  |   Privacy Policy